Caroline Rowan

The Board amended paragraph 11 of its December 8, 2000 decision regarding a displacement application.

The responding party objected to the exclusion of full-time employees from the part-time bargaining unit, arguing for a single unit of full and part-time employees.

The Board directed that the ballot box be sealed and that the applications be listed together for a hearing to address the bargaining unit issue.

The applicants sought a declaration of a sale of business from the responding health care group to a children's hospital.

In this interlocutory decision, the applicants requested that the Board direct the responding parties to comply with a previous document production order and to stop planned consultations with staff until compliance.

The Board directed compliance with the production order by December 18, 2000, but declined to order a stop to the consultations in the context of the sale of business applications.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted a request by counsel for the Service Employees International Union, Local 204, to extend the deadline for filing its responding material to December 15, 2000.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of volunteer firefighters employed by the responding party municipality.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, arguing that none of the individuals met the definition of 'volunteer firefighter' under the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997.

The Board found the proposed unit could be appropriate and directed a representation vote, ordering that the ballot box be sealed until the disputes regarding the bargaining unit description and employee status are resolved.

The applicant filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging that the responding union breached its duty of fair representation under section 74.

The union advised the Board that it had not received a copy of the application.

The Board directed the applicant to deliver a copy of the application and related documents to the responding party forthwith.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent full-time employees at the responding party's home.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support and directed a representation vote.

The intervenor union requested that the application be dismissed or the vote delayed due to alleged unfair practices and breaches of a court order and union constitution, which the Board rejected.

However, because the responding party objected to the exclusion of part-time employees from the proposed bargaining unit, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed and the matter listed for a hearing to determine the appropriate bargaining unit description.

The applicant, Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 1059, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, David Martin Enterprises (London) Limited.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification for a bargaining unit of office and clerical employees at a nursing home, who were currently represented by the intervenor union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant was a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held to allow employees to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite forty percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board ordered a representation vote to be held, allowing eligible employees to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification for a part-time bargaining unit.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union and directed a representation vote.

The Board dismissed the intervenor's request to dismiss the application or seal the ballot box based on alleged unfair practices and constitutional breaches.

However, because the responding party objected to the exclusion of full-time employees and sought a single combined unit, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed and the matter listed for a hearing together with a related application for the full-time unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications for certification by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification seeking to represent a bargaining unit of nursing home employees currently represented by the intervenor.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty percent.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency to determine whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matter sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no further request is made.

The applicant brought an application against the responding party union.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant, Christian Labour Association of Canada, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Durham Region Attendant Care.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the proposed bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the Corporation of the Town of Rayside-Balfour.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant union.