Brian McLean

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

Following a representation vote where not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The Board imposed a one-year bar on any further applications for certification by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant, Teamsters Local Union 91, applied for certification.

The only issue in dispute was the trade union status of the applicant, which the parties agreed could be determined without a hearing.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The intervenor union requested that the Board postpone issuing a certificate pending the outcome of a contempt motion in Superior Court and proceedings under the Canadian Labour Congress constitution.

The Board declined to postpone the decision, noting that over 50 percent of the ballots cast in the representation vote were in favour of the applicant, and section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 requires the Board to certify the applicant in such circumstances.

A certificate was issued to the applicant.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than 50 percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the intervenor union requested that the Board postpone issuing a certificate pending the outcome of a contempt motion in Superior Court and internal Canadian Labour Congress proceedings.

The Board dismissed the request, finding no valid reason to delay the final determination and noting that section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 requires the Board to certify the applicant when a majority of votes are in its favour.

A certificate was issued to the applicant.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision regarding a representation vote for registered and graduate nurses employed by The Scarborough Hospital.

A majority of votes were cast in favour of the Ontario Nurses' Association, Local 111.

Consequently, the Board terminated the bargaining rights of any other unions for these employees and appointed the Ontario Nurses' Association, Local 111 as their bargaining agent.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of Tobias House of Toronto Attendant Care Inc. A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots cast were in favour of the union.

As a result, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the union for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken and established the voting constituency, noting a dispute over the inclusion of office and clerical staff whose ballots would be segregated.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

The Board found that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the agreement of the parties regarding the appropriate bargaining unit and the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board directed a representation vote to be held, with segregated ballots for disputed positions including vocational services employees and Department Heads.

The employer gave notice under section 8.1 of the Act disagreeing with the employee estimate but agreed to count the ballots.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of Operation Springboard in Sault Ste.

Marie.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union and defined the appropriate bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for Sales Execution Specialists employed by the responding party in Cobourg, Ontario.

Following a representation vote where more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the certification and ordered a certificate to issue.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party.

The parties reached Minutes of Settlement, which were filed with the Board.

Having regard to the settlement, the Board ordered the application terminated.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent office and clerical employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent.

The Board ordered a representation vote to be held, with segregated ballots for the disputed positions of Bookkeeper and Executive Assistant.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union.

A certificate was issued for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The majority of the Board found that the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and ordered a representation vote, with disputed ballots to be segregated.

The dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.