Municipality ordered to accept drainage petition and appoint an engineer to investigate flooding issues.
The appellants appealed the municipality's decision to deny their petition for drainage works under section 4(1) of the Drainage Act.
The appellants experienced significant surface and subsurface water flow from a neighbouring property, causing damage to their foundation.
The municipality argued the issue could be resolved without a petition and raised concerns about the threshold requirements.
The Tribunal found the appellants established a valid drainage issue warranting investigation and ordered the municipality to accept the petition and appoint an engineer to determine if the statutory thresholds are met.
Appeals of municipal drain engineer's report largely dismissed, with minor adjustments to right-of-way allowance and maintenance assessments.
Several landowners appealed the Engineer's Report for the Filsinger Municipal Drain under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act.
The appellants challenged the inclusion of certain lands in the watershed, the scope and cost of the proposed drainage work, the right-of-way allowances, and the assessment calculations.
The Tribunal dismissed the section 48 appeals regarding the watershed and drainage work, finding the existing drain was in poor condition and the proposed improvements were necessary.
The Tribunal allowed one appellant's appeal in part, increasing his right-of-way allowance based on a higher land value.
The Tribunal also allowed the section 54 appeals in part, adjusting the maintenance assessments for the upstream reach of the closed drain, but otherwise upheld the engineer's assessment calculations.
Appeals of a municipal drainage report partially allowed to increase a right-of-way allowance and adjust maintenance assessments.
The Tribunal dismissed the section 48 appeals regarding the watershed and drainage work, finding the existing drain was in poor condition and the proposed work was necessary.
The Tribunal allowed Tyson Kraemer's section 48 appeal in part, increasing his right-of-way allowance.
The Tribunal also allowed the section 54 appeals in part, adjusting the maintenance assessments for the upstream reach of the closed drain, but otherwise accepted the Engineer's assessment calculations.