The appellant jockey appealed a one-year suspension imposed by the Stewards for an unsatisfactory ride, alleging he failed to persevere with his mount or demonstrate an effort to win.
The jockey had ridden the horse without using the whip, keeping it on the bit, which contrasted with conventional riding methods.
The Commission found that the jockey was following the trainer's specific instructions not to whip the horse, as previous aggressive whipping had caused the horse to stop running.
The Commission concluded that the jockey's ride was a genuine effort to achieve the best possible result and quashed the suspension.