Avvy Yao-Yao Go

The appellant appealed the suspension of his driver's licence by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles, which was based on a Medical Condition Report indicating he suffered from seizures.

The appellant did not attend the hearing and failed to provide medical evidence to support his claim that his seizures only occurred while sleeping.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal applied the Canadian Council of Motor Transportation Administrators Medical Standards for Drivers and confirmed the suspension, finding that the appellant's condition was likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely.

The appellant, a school bus driver, appealed the Minister of Transportation's decision to downgrade her commercial licence to a class 'G' licence due to a medical condition.

At the hearing, the appellant confirmed she had filed a Notice of Withdrawal.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal, issued no order, and closed the file.

The appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend her driver's licence following a medical condition report citing unstable mental illness and drug dependence.

The Registrar requested updated mental health and substance use assessments, which the appellant failed to provide.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the appellant's testimony regarding her medical history and substance use to be unreliable and noted her lack of insight into her mental health conditions, including a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder.

The Tribunal concluded the appellant suffers from a mental condition likely to significantly interfere with her ability to drive safely and confirmed the licence suspension.

The appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence due to a medical report indicating cognitive impairment and dementia.

The Registrar required a satisfactory functional driving assessment before reinstating the licence.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the appellant lacked insight into his medical condition and that the Registrar's request for a functional assessment was reasonable to ensure public safety.

The Tribunal confirmed the suspension.

The appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence due to an alcohol use disorder and dysthymia.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that while the appellant's dysthymia and anxiety did not significantly interfere with his ability to drive, his alcohol use disorder did.

The Tribunal noted two medical condition reports from psychiatrists and the appellant's recent hospitalization for alcohol use.

Applying the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators Medical Standards for Drivers, the Tribunal concluded the appellant had not met the required period of abstinence and confirmed the licence suspension.

The appellant appealed the suspension of his driver's licence, which was suspended after a psychiatrist submitted a medical condition report indicating the appellant suffered from alcohol dependence.

The appellant argued his condition was under control and submitted an assessment from his family physician.

The Tribunal found the appellant's evidence regarding his alcohol consumption and compliance with medication to be inconsistent.

The Tribunal concluded the appellant suffers from a medical condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely and confirmed the suspension.

The appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence due to cognitive impairment and dementia.

The appellant had failed a functional driving assessment and refused to undergo another one.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal confirmed the suspension, finding that the appellant suffers from a medical condition that significantly interferes with his ability to operate a motor vehicle safely.