Anthony Brown

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had the requisite 40% membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed a representation vote.

The intervenor's requests to dismiss the application, delay the vote, or seal the ballot box based on alleged unfair practices and breaches of a court order and union constitution were denied.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against her union following her termination by the intervenor employer.

The union and employer requested the application be dismissed for failing to disclose a prima facie case.

The Board noted the application lacked details explaining how the union's conduct was arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.

The Board directed the applicant to file reply submissions detailing the material facts relied upon, failing which the application would be deemed terminated.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union brought an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997 regarding the merger of North York General Hospital and North York Branson Hospital.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement agreeing that North York General Hospital is the successor employer and establishing appropriate multi-site bargaining units for full-time service, part-time service, and full-time office and clerical employees.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board endorsed the settlement, declaring the agreed-upon bargaining units appropriate and confirming the union as the bargaining agent.

The applicant employer and responding union filed a joint application for the Board's consent to the early termination of their collective agreement.

Notices were posted on the employer's premises, and no objections were filed by any affected employees.

The Board granted its consent to the early termination of the collective agreement.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of employees at the responding party's Apple Hill Quarry.

The applicant brought an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees at the responding party's long term care facility.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and ordered a certificate to issue.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on future applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent part-time employees and students at the responding party's long term care facility.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant sought a review of a refusal to issue an order under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The parties entered into written Minutes of Settlement with the assistance of a Labour Relations Officer.

As the settlement disposed of all issues in dispute, the Board terminated the application in accordance with subsection 69.1(5) of the Act.

The applicants filed for religious exemption under section 52 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding union raised a timeliness issue and requested it be determined by written submissions.

The Board declined to deal with the timeliness issue exclusively by written submissions and directed the Registrar to schedule the consolidated applications for an oral hearing, including preliminary issues.

The applicant requested to add Toronto Hydro Telecom Inc. as a responding party and to amend the application schedules.

The responding parties did not file a response to the request.

The Board granted the request, amended the style of cause, and gave the newly added party a deadline to file a response.

The applicant sought to amend his application to plead new allegations of reprisal by the responding party employer.

The responding party objected, arguing the new particulars occurred three months after the original events and lacked a causal connection.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board permitted the amendment, finding no serious prejudice to the responding party, while leaving the relevance of the amendments to be determined at the hearing.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.