Who is Alison Renton?

Alison Renton is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 589 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Alison Renton sit on?

Alison Renton sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Alison Renton decide?

Alison Renton's most common areas include Human Rights (589 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (203 decisions), Administrative Law (177 decisions). Alison Renton has handled 589 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Alison Renton made?

Alison Renton has 589 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Alison Renton?

Representatives who frequently appear before Alison Renton include Self-represented, Wade Poziomka, Brenda Bowlby.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Alison Renton — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Civil Litigation - Defendant

Real Estate Law

Alison Renton

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

589

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 437Vice-chair· 77Adjudicator· 51Adjudicator· 14Vice-Chair· 4Vice-Chair· 3Vice-chair· 1

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2010

Respondent granted 5 days to file a Response after failing to do so within prescribed time.

The applicant filed a human rights application.

The respondent failed to file a Response within the prescribed time, despite acknowledging receipt of the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision requiring the applicant to confirm the respondent's address and granting the respondent 5 days to file a Response with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Steven McKinnon v. Sheral Young, 2010 HRTO 399

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2010

Request to dismiss application denied because abandoned Small Claims Court action did not address substance.

The respondent requested that the human rights application alleging disability discrimination in employment be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent argued that the applicant had previously filed a Small Claims Court action regarding the same facts, which was dismissed as abandoned.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that because the civil claim was dismissed as abandoned, the court did not appropriately deal with the substance of the human rights allegations.

Stephen Kelly v. Zone 5 Landscaping & Property Maintenance Inc., 2010 HRTO 390

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 18, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn on consent of the parties.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Keith Tobey v. Transaxle Parts Cambridge, 2010 HRTO 384

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 18, 2010

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Mayer v. Mike Dean’s Super Food Stores, 2010 HRTO 135

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 18, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with consent of the respondents.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw the human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Bywater v. Wolf Steel Ltd., 2010 HRTO 383

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 16, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Long v. Advance Precision, 2010 HRTO 351

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 16, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Natalie Williamson v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 793, 2010 HRTO 352

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 16, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with consent of the respondents and leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Salehi Esmati v. Costco Wholesale Canada, 2010 HRTO 350

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2010

Tribunal ordered a hearing to determine if school bussing constitutes a service to a disabled parent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, claiming she requires school bussing services for her children due to her own disability.

The respondent school board filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to dismiss the application for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that transportation services are provided to students, not parents.

The Tribunal deferred the request and ordered a half-day conference call hearing to hear submissions on whether the respondent provides 'services' to the applicant within the meaning of the Human Rights Code.

Loriann Contini v. Rainbow District School Board, 2010 HRTO 241

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance based on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability when the respondent failed to return her to work despite medical clearance.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant's union had filed a grievance based on the same facts and issues.

The union also requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and deferred the application pending the completion of the grievance process, noting the substantial overlap between the proceedings and the concurrent jurisdiction of grievance arbitrators over human rights issues.

Strickland v. Scarborough Hospital, 2010 HRTO 240

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2010

Application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's directions within the specified two-week timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Barton v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2010 HRTO 239

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2010

Applicant directed to provide submissions on whether he has a 'record of offences' under the Code.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences, specifically concerning security screening and application forms used by the respondent.

The respondent questioned whether the applicant had a 'record of offences' within the meaning of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the applicant to provide submissions on whether he has a 'record of offences' as defined in section 10 of the Code, failing which the application may be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or abandoned.

Cam McKenzie v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Government Services, 2010 HRTO 238

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2010

Adjournment request denied as change of representative and witness vacations are not extraordinary circumstances.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the grounds of age and reprisal.

Shortly before the scheduled hearing, the respondent requested an adjournment, citing a change in representation to its Executive Director due to financial costs, the need for more time to prepare, and the unavailability of two unnamed witnesses on vacation.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, finding that the reasons cited were within the respondent's control and did not constitute extraordinary circumstances.

The Tribunal also directed the respondent to immediately disclose the documents it intends to rely upon and its list of witnesses, warning of potential evidentiary consequences for non-compliance.

Arias v. Centre for Spanish-Speaking Peoples, 2010 HRTO 213

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2010

Conference call hearing scheduled to consider early dismissal request based on signed release.

The applicant filed an Application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family and marital status following her dismissal.

The respondents requested an early dismissal of the Application, arguing the applicant had signed a full and final release.

The Tribunal noted that section 43(2) of the Human Rights Code requires affording parties an opportunity to make oral submissions before finally disposing of an Application.

Accordingly, the Tribunal scheduled a one-hour conference call hearing to consider the early dismissal request.

Judith Zarubiak v. Brain Injury Services of Hamilton, 2010 HRTO 212

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2010

Tribunal gives corporate respondent 5 days to file a response before proceeding without them.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The Tribunal's initial notices were returned as undeliverable.

After obtaining a new address for the corporate respondent, the Tribunal issued another notice, but no response was filed.

The Tribunal issued this interim decision warning the corporate respondent that failure to file a response within 5 days could result in the Tribunal proceeding without them and deeming them to have accepted the allegations, pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure.

Jacquelyn Trowell v. 6286160 Canada Limited o/a CR Printing, 2010 HRTO 208

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 26, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal on consent of the respondents.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Sheedy v. Lamb Real Estate Limited, 2010 HRTO 171

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 26, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with consent of the respondents.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Cooke v. Norampac, a Division of Cascades Canada Inc., 2010 HRTO 172

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent grievance process raising identical issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of age and disability regarding the termination of certain benefits upon reaching age 65.

The respondent hospital and union requested that the application be deferred because a concurrent grievance had been filed on the applicant's behalf raising the same human rights issues.

The Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application pending the completion of the grievance process, noting the substantial overlap in facts and issues.

Mary Pole v. The Ottawa Hospital, 2010 HRTO 150

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2010

Reconsideration request denied as applicant failed to meet the conditions under Rule 26.5.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights complaint.

He argued that the Tribunal wrongfully assessed credibility, ignored determinative facts, and that the respondents had an unfair advantage due to expert legal advice.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant failed to explain why the requested evidence could not have been obtained prior to the hearing or specify what determinative facts were ignored.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant did not meet any of the conditions for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

Junejo v. Peel (Regional Municipality), 2010 HRTO 157

Alison Renton

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 20, 2010

Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to address timeliness and prima facie case issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability by his employer and union regarding events from 2004.

The respondents requested dismissal on the grounds of delay and failure to disclose a prima facie case.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision scheduling a conference call hearing to hear submissions on whether the application was timely, whether any delay was incurred in good faith, and whether the allegations established a violation of the Code.

White v. Avon Maitland District School Board, 2010 HRTO 130

Page 25 of 30 (589 cases)

Applicant

Alexandre BystrovSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry BezaireSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ben WeiglSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward YeboahSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ellaine RichardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary GrzywoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jamal HamedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kira VallenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lubov VolnyanskySelf-represented
1 appearance
Oussama YaldokaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen BullSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Anna VereschaginCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo PolicelliCounsel
1 appearance
Michael GauthierCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance
Robert W. AugerCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Jack BraithwaiteCounsel
1 appearance

for Ajax Automobile (2008) Inc. o/a Ajax Nissan

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for Ajax Automotive (2008) Inc. o/a Ajax Nissan

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for College of Physicians and Surgeons and Gail Buss

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for Comcare Health Services and Shelley Dietz

Margaret SzilassyCounsel
2 appearances

for Dina Stolyarova

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances
Grace VaccerelliCounsel
1 appearance

for E&E Seegmiller Limited and Les Coulas

Jordan SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for Forestwood Co-operative Homes Inc.

Paula BoutisCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

David FrolovSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris FerringoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and Mosregion Investments Corp.

Igor BakouchevSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Housing Connections

Gordon SteinbergAgent
1 appearance

for Human Rights Watch and Kimberley Hui

Nancy HammAgent
1 appearance

for Huron Shores Gymnastics and Trampoline Club and John Craig

John CraigSelf-represented
1 appearance

for IDP Group Inc.

Mike DagenaisAgent
1 appearance

for Igor Bakouchev and Mosregion Investments Corp.

Igor BakouchevSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Janet Menard

Sarah KimAgent
1 appearance
John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for JM Tek Ltd. and Janusz Maciag

Gerard ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Rittenberg

Lisa ConstantineCounsel
1 appearance

for K.H.

Allison ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for LaFarge Canada Inc.

Tom MoutsatsosCounsel
1 appearance

for Lakeridge Health

Jessica KearseyCounsel
1 appearance

for Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Cheri DiNovo, Carly Jones and Susan Rogers

Carly JonesAgent
1 appearance

for Marcin Bachleda

Marcin BachledaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Matthew Dawiczewski

Brian DoodyAgent
1 appearance

for Michael Hatton

Michael HattonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Michael Sullivan

Rachel TurnpenneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Midway Nissan

Hermie AbrahamCounsel
2 appearances

for Miller Thompson LLP

Erik MarshallCounsel
1 appearance
Eric MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

for North York General Hospital, Esther Koven, and Ashton White

Hal RolphCounsel
1 appearance

for Saint Elizabeth Health Care, Shirlee Sharkey, Cheryl Johnson, Trish P. Maxwell and Neilia Cabral

Margaret TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for Saint Elizabeth Health Care, Shirlee Sharkey, Cheryl Johnson, Trish P. Maxwell, Neilia Cabral

Margaret TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Limited and Darren Blewitt

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected party

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Public Service Alliance of CanadaUnion representative
1 appearance
Human Rights Legal Support CentreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
5 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
5 appearances
Janina FogelsCounsel
4 appearances
Lubov VolnyanskySelf-represented
4 appearances
Bill KoitsisSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mahdi TarabainSelf-represented
3 appearances
Delphine St. JacquesAgent
3 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
3 appearances
Tony SangiulianoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Weihua ShiSelf-represented
3 appearances
William FlorenceCounsel
2 appearances
Kathleen DeBlock BoersmaCounsel
2 appearances
Laura LunanskyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
2 appearances
S.M.Self-represented
2 appearances
Heather HumphriesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Daniel KahramanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Chantel TieCounsel
2 appearances
Karen FranceschinaSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Mindy NobleCounsel
3 appearances
T.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Auto Workers, Local 524

Les VilneffUnion representative
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance
Jean C. H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Guy SeguinAgent
1 appearance

for the corporate respondent and remaining personal respondents

Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance

for the corporate respondent and the personal respondents Zoltan Dobinai and Christina Dobsinai

Michael LernerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
2 appearances
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Evan SchillerCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Paul LaCourseUnion representative
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance
Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmakhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Canadian Auto Workers Unions, Local 1285

Leon RideoutUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Chrysler Canada Inc.

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the personal respondent

Stephen BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Shawna KadykaloCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Brenda BowlbyCounsel
5 appearances
Michelle AltonCounsel
4 appearances
Caroline CohenCounsel
3 appearances
Ann DinnertCounsel
2 appearances
Elizabeth ForsterCounsel
2 appearances
Sarah CrossleyCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer BirrellCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Lauri ReesorCounsel
2 appearances
Jeremy HannCounsel
2 appearances
Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
2 appearances
Ted KovacsCounsel
2 appearances
Nancy SalernoCounsel
2 appearances
Vera SimpsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Reddy ChavaliAgent
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
Jim KaytorAgent
2 appearances
Robert W. WeirCounsel
2 appearances
Devon RyerseCounsel
1 appearance
Duane ReaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1145678 Ontario Limited

Christopher HerrmannAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Abitibi Consolidated Company Of Canada

Peter ThorupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ajax Automobile (2008) Inc. o/a Ajax Nissan

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Intervenor

Angela RaeCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Avon Maitland District School Board

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Chief of Police, Toronto Police Service

Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, City of Toronto

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domenic Commisso

Domenic CommissoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada, Limited

Margaret SzilassyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle AltonCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Holcim (Canada) Inc.

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Housing Connections

Gordon SteinbergAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Midway Nissan (Whitby/Oshawa) Ltd.

Hermie AbrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers’ Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) Local 1520

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Carla GoncalvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peel Regional Police Association

Gary HopkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Quinte Healthcare Corporation

Maureen HoustonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
4 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
3 appearances
H.P. RolphCounsel
2 appearances
Donna PetriCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn GoodmanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kristen TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Lia PreydeCounsel
1 appearance
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Matt DewarCounsel
1 appearance
Matthew DemeoCounsel
1 appearance
Meighan Ferris-MilesCounsel
1 appearance
Michelle DobranowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Mr. GourleyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CahillCounsel
1 appearance
Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
R. Gordon HillsCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (except Asha Rathod)

Brenda BowlbyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents FCA Canada Inc. and Rob Gardiner

Clifford HartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services on behalf of the Ontario Provincial Police, Janice Mulcock and Rob Hagerman

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Simona Dinu

Simona DinuSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents Lynn Bradley and Ronald Laliberté

Sara BlakeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Sibley and Associates and Mary Virio

Mark KlaimanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart MacDonald

Stuart MacDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Police Services Board

Lauri ReesorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Service

Susan HirotaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Howard LawUnion representative
1 appearance

for Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada and Chris Dahmer

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers, Local 9597, Affected Party

Sherry CharetteUnion representative
1 appearance

for UNITE HERE Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for Wee Watch Day Care Systems

Gordon BentCounsel
1 appearance

for Women’s College Hospital Family Practice Health Centre

Janet MurdochCounsel
1 appearance

for Women’s College Hospital, Family Practice Health Centre

Janet ZiveCounsel
1 appearance

for York University, Lillie Lum, and Douglas Peers

Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for York University, Lillie Lum, Douglas Peers

Leanne De FilippisCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for the Applicant

L.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Judith ZarubiakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margarita AriasSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his behalf and on behalf of the Corporate Respondent

Igor BakouchevSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

David FrolovSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilles GagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael LachanceSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Mourad BelamineSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sam BattagliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Claudio Ruiz-PilarteAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Ann DinnertCounsel
1 appearance

589

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.5

cases/mo

HRTO589(100%)

Decision types

motion

550

trial

Page 25 of 30 (589 cases)