A. Israel

The accused was previously found unfit to stand trial on various charges and detained at CAMH.

At the initial disposition hearing before the Ontario Review Board, the hospital, the Attorney General, and amicus curiae all agreed that the accused was presently fit to stand trial.

Relying on the evidence of the treating physician, the Board found the accused fit to stand trial and directed that she be returned to court for a fitness hearing, without making a Keep Fit Order.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual and Restriction of Liberty hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for uttering death threats.

The accused had been living in the community but was returned to the hospital due to risky and escalating behaviour, including lying on public streets.

The Board found that the return to the hospital was warranted and represented the least onerous and least restrictive decision available.

The Board ordered the continuation of the Detention Order, specifying that the accused be detained on a General Forensic Unit.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for break and enter and prowl by night.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, did not attend the hearing but was represented by counsel.

The hospital, the Attorney General, and the accused jointly recommended a continuation of the conditional discharge.

The Board accepted the evidence that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety, noting his history of non-compliance and prior offences, but found that the risk could be managed in the community under the existing conditions.

The conditional discharge was continued.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for murder due to schizophrenia.

The accused had been living independently in the community without incident since 2021 and demonstrated sustained remission of symptoms, strong insight, and strict medication compliance.

The hospital and the accused sought an absolute discharge, and the Crown did not oppose.

The Board concluded that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to public safety and granted an absolute discharge.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for assault with a weapon and aggravated assault.

The accused's treating psychiatrist testified that the accused's mental state and insight had dramatically improved after resuming antipsychotic medication, though a significant threat to public safety remained.

The Board accepted the joint submission of the parties to maintain the current Disposition of a Detention Order with privileges, noting the accused's promising trajectory toward community living.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was found not criminally responsible for weapons offences and is subject to a conditional discharge.

The accused, diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, did not attend the hearing.

The hospital and Crown submitted that the current disposition was appropriate, and the accused's counsel conceded that he continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board accepted the joint submission, noting the accused's vulnerability to stressors and predictable instability during transitions, and ordered the continuation of the conditional discharge.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was found not criminally responsible for murder due to schizophrenia.

The accused had recently eloped from the hospital and was found with cannabis, setting back his progress.

The Board accepted the joint submission of the parties that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to community safety and ordered the continuation of his detention order at CAMH Forensic Services.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for second-degree murder, appeared for an annual review hearing before the Ontario Review Board.

The hospital and Crown sought to maintain the current detention order with minor corrections, while the accused sought a conditional discharge.

The Board accepted the psychiatric evidence that the accused suffers from a brittle illness and is highly sensitive to medication changes and stress.

Finding that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety and requires careful housing progression, the Board ordered that the detention order be maintained.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault and other charges in 2023, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual hearing.

The hospital and the accused jointly sought an absolute discharge, which the Crown ultimately supported.

The Board found that the accused, who is stable in supervised housing, medication compliant, and has improved insight, no longer poses a significant threat to the safety of the public.

An absolute discharge was ordered.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for break and enter and mischief.

The accused remains under a detention order at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.

The Board heard evidence that the accused has made incremental progress despite recent incidents involving cannabis use.

All parties agreed that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered that the current disposition be maintained with minor amendments, including extending the geographic boundary for community living to the Greater Toronto Area and setting a 200-kilometre radius for indirect privilege passes.

The accused was found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder for second-degree murder after stabbing a friend 22 times while psychotic and paranoid.

At his initial disposition hearing before the Ontario Review Board, the hospital and Crown recommended a detention order with a range of privileges and conditions, including a weapons ban and substance prohibitions.

The Board accepted the joint submission, noting the accused's strong insight, medication compliance, and two years of being asymptomatic, while adding non-contact and non-attendance clauses.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for multiple violent offences.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and substance use disorders, had been residing in a 24-hour high support community placement and demonstrated sustained psychiatric stability.

Relying on uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety, as a relapse in mental illness or substance use would likely lead to violent re-offending.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current Detention Order to ensure ongoing support and supervision.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, resides in a high-support community residence under a detention order.

Based on a joint submission and uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence that the accused remains significantly psychotic, has impaired insight, and recently engaged in a minor physical altercation, the Board found the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the existing detention disposition without changes.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault.

The accused has diagnoses of schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder.

All parties jointly submitted that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety and that the current Detention Order should be continued.

The Board accepted the joint submission, finding that the accused's history of violence linked to psychotic decompensation, exacerbated by substance use, required the structure and oversight of a hospital setting.

The Detention Disposition was continued.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for second-degree murder.

The hospital and the accused requested that community living within the GTA be added to his privileges, which the Crown opposed.

The Board noted the accused's positive progress, adherence to treatment, and lack of aggression.

The Board granted the addition of a community living privilege in supportive housing, along with indirectly supervised privileges in the community, to allow for careful reintegration and assessment of independent living skills.

The Ontario Review Board conducted a mandatory annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault, has diagnoses of treatment-resistant schizophrenia and substance use disorder.

Relying on uncontroverted expert evidence, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to risks of substance relapse, housing instability, and medication non-adherence.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention disposition as the necessary and appropriate measure to manage the accused's risk while supporting his reintegration.

The accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for arson and mischief, was subject to an annual review hearing before the Ontario Review Board.

The hospital and the Crown recommended the continuation of the existing detention disposition, while the accused sought a conditional discharge.

Relying on the uncontroverted expert evidence of the treating psychiatrist, the Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his limited insight, recent re-emergence of psychotic symptoms, and the risk of unsafe behaviour during decompensation.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention disposition without changes.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review the hospital's decision to significantly restrict the liberty of the accused, who had been found not criminally responsible for assault offences, and to conduct an annual review of his disposition.

The accused's mental state had deteriorated in the community following cannabis use, leading to his readmission to the hospital.

Relying on uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the restriction of liberty was warranted, necessary, and the least onerous option.

The Board further concluded that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of his Detention Order, with an amendment permitting community living within the Greater Toronto Area.

The Ontario Review Board held a Restriction of Liberty hearing after the accused, who had been living in the community, was readmitted to the hospital.

The hospital presented evidence that the accused had become increasingly unreliable in attending appointments and had tested positive for substances, leading to a deterioration in his mental status.

The Board accepted the medical evidence that the accused was not yet ready to return to the community.

The Board found that the return to hospital was warranted and that his ongoing detention in the hospital was the least onerous and least restrictive decision available.

The accused, previously found unfit to stand trial on charges including assault and obstructing a peace officer, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for a fitness hearing.

Following treatment with antipsychotic medications at the hospital, her mental status significantly improved.

Based on the joint submission of the parties and the psychiatric evidence, the Board found the accused fit to stand trial and remitted her matter back to court for adjudication.