A. Haward

The applicant union filed a related employer application and a construction industry grievance against the responding parties.

The parties reached a settlement and signed Minutes of Settlement and a Consent Order.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued declarations that the responding parties constitute a single employer bound by the applicable collective agreement.

The Board also declared that the responding parties violated the collective agreement and ordered them to pay $5,000 in damages to the applicant.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

On the agreement of the parties, the Board adjourned the application sine die, noting that it would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within one year.

The applicant, Industrial Wood & Allied Workers of Canada IWA-Canada, and the responding party, Commonwealth Plywood Co. Limited, requested the termination of the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and terminated the application.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement agreeing to resolve the grievance for a payment of $4,000.00 by the responding parties.

The Board ordered the responding parties to comply with the Minutes of Settlement and pay the agreed sum pursuant to section 96(7) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Board issued declarations and directions on consent, finding that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement, had violated it, and ordering the payment of $2,160.13 in damages.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications for certification by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board alleging the responding party violated the collective agreement.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement settling the matter.

The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement, had violated its terms, and ordered the payment of $10,500 in damages as per the settlement terms.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board determined the appropriate bargaining unit for electricians and electricians' apprentices and directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

At the outset of the hearing, the parties advised the Board that they had resolved all matters in dispute.

The Board noted the responding party's agreement to pay all outstanding benefits payments to the applicant by December 15, 2000.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit contributions.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Proceeding by default, the Board accepted the applicant's allegations, declared that the employer violated the collective agreement, and ordered the payment of $13,856.87 in outstanding contributions and penalties, plus $214.00 in costs.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit contributions and vacation pay.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the facts in the application accepted and issued a default decision.

The Board declared the responding party bound by the collective agreement, found it in violation, and ordered it to pay $27,488.93 in unpaid contributions plus $214.00 in costs.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board determined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

When the responding party failed to appear at the scheduled hearing, the applicant requested an arrest warrant for a principal of the responding party.

The Board found that the principal had been properly served with a summons and conduct money, and that his presence and the requested documents were material to the ends of justice.

Pursuant to its authority under the Labour Relations Act, the Board issued an arrest warrant to compel the witness's attendance at the continuation of the hearing.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent in the proposed bargaining unit.

Accordingly, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party violated the sub-contracting clause of the provincial collective agreement and failed to comply with a prior Board direction.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board declared the responding party bound by the collective agreement, found it in violation, and ordered it to cease and desist and pay damages and costs.

The applicant trade union sought a declaration under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and requested an order for the production of documents from the responding employers prior to the hearing.

The Board directed the responding parties to file a list of documents they were prepared to produce and those they refused to produce, and to make the available documents ready for inspection by the applicant's counsel prior to the hearing.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

A principal of the responding party was properly served with a summons and conduct money but failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant requested an arrest warrant.

The Board, exercising its powers under sections 48(12)(d) and 111(2)(c) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, issued a warrant for the arrest of the witness to compel his attendance and the production of required documents at the continuation of the hearing.

The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act.

As the applicant had not previously established its status as a trade union under its new name, the Board deferred the status determination but directed a representation vote.

The Board determined the appropriate voting constituency by including geographic areas where employees were working on the application date, specifically Board Areas 2, 7, and 8, while excluding Board Area 6.

The applicant referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board attempted to serve the responding party with the Confirmation of Filing but encountered facsimile and courier errors.

As a result, the responding party did not receive the necessary forms in time for the scheduled hearing.

The Board adjourned the hearing to allow the responding party sufficient time to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

The applicant union filed a construction industry grievance and a related employer/successor rights application against the responding parties.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party, Eastern Gunite and Sandblasting, is bound to the applicable provincial and heavy construction collective agreements.