The accused was charged with being a party to sexual assault, sexual interference, and procuring a person under 18 for sexual activity.
The Crown alleged that the accused allowed two masked men to sexually assault her 10-year-old daughter in exchange for cigarettes and cash.
The court applied the W.(D.) framework to assess the conflicting testimony of the accused and the child complainant.
The court found the child's evidence credible and reliable, rejecting the accused's denials.
The accused was found guilty on all counts.
