The appellant appealed his sentence of 24 months' imprisonment and probation for multiple counts of robbery, unlawful confinement, and related offences arising from an armed robbery at a grocery store.
The appellant argued his sentence was disproportionate compared to similar cases.
The Court of Appeal found no error in principle and held the sentence was not manifestly unfit, noting the serious aggravating factors including planning, multiple perpetrators, and the use of an imitation machine gun.
The appeal was dismissed.
