2 total
The Court of Appeal exercised its discretion to order that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario issued a costs endorsement following an appeal from a Divisional Court order.
In the exercise of its discretion, the court ordered that all parties bear their own costs of the appeal.
The Court of Appeal affirmed that the duty to consult does not apply to the law-making process and that revoking a forest management regulation did not trigger the duty.
The appellants, a group of First Nations, appealed a Divisional Court decision that dismissed their application for judicial review.
They argued that Ontario's revocation of a forest management regulation (MNR-75) and amendments to the Environmental Assessment Act (Bill 197) breached the Crown's duty to consult and the honour of the Crown.
The Court of Appeal upheld the Divisional Court's decision, finding that the duty to consult does not apply to the law-making process (Bill 197) and that the revocation of MNR-75 did not give rise to a duty to consult as the alleged adverse effects were speculative and equivalent protections remained in force through other legally binding instruments.
