This endorsement addresses a case management motion concerning outstanding follow-up questions from discovery and the timing of the plaintiff's expert report.
The plaintiff sought further answers from the defendant, TD Canada Trust, regarding security protocols and risk assessments following an alleged assault at an ATM vestibule.
The court applied principles of proportionality and finality, rejecting many of the plaintiff's requests for information deemed beyond the scope of appropriate discovery or based on information that should have been obtained earlier.
The court also found the plaintiff responsible for significant delays in the litigation and ordered the expert report to be produced promptly, with strict timelines, while allowing for a supplemental report if new information warranted it.