The applicant appealed the municipality's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision for a residential development.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement to phase the proceedings, separating a contested woodlot into a future phase.
The Tribunal converted the case management conference into a settlement hearing and, relying on uncontested expert planning evidence, allowed the appeals in part to approve the planning instruments for the first phase of the development.
