The applicant alleged that the respondent children's aid society failed to comply with a settlement agreement requiring an indigenous circle to address her concerns.
The applicant claimed she felt rushed, lacked a support person, and was dissatisfied with the video platform and answers provided.
The Child and Family Services Review Board found that the respondent convened the circle within the required timeframe with a neutral facilitator, and that the absence of a support person was due to the applicant's choice.
The Board concluded the respondent complied with the core requirements of the settlement agreement and closed the file.