The appellant appealed the dismissal of his claim for malicious prosecution against the respondents.
The trial judge had found that the appellant failed to establish the elements of malicious prosecution, specifically that the respondents, rather than the Crown, made the decision to prosecute.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the trial judge's application of the law or apprehension of the evidence, noting that her credibility findings were entitled to deference.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
