The respondent College brought a motion to quash the applicant denturist's application for judicial review.
The applicant had sought to quash a referral of professional misconduct allegations to the College's Discipline Committee, arguing unreasonable delay, procedural unfairness, and reasonable apprehension of bias.
The court held that a single judge of the Divisional Court has jurisdiction to quash a judicial review application.
The court granted the motion to quash, finding the application premature as the applicant had not exhausted his administrative remedies.
The applicant could raise his arguments before the Discipline Committee and would have a full right of appeal to the Divisional Court thereafter.
