The Applicant Society brought a motion for summary judgment seeking findings that three children (K.M., M.B., and J.B.) were in need of protection and should be placed in the Society's extended care.
The children's mother opposed, proposing a customary care agreement.
The court found ample evidence of the children being in need of protection due to physical and emotional abuse and sexual assault.
The court granted the Society's motion, finding no genuine issue for trial, and ordered the children into extended Society care, rejecting the customary care agreement as it could not be coercively imposed and was not agreed upon by all parties.
