The applicants requested a review of the Tribunal's previous decision regarding appeals from an engineer's report and the Court of Revision on the Saxon Drain.
The applicants argued the Tribunal erred in its treatment of evidence from various witnesses and failed to consider a 2001 engineer's report.
The Tribunal found no indication that evidence was improperly scrutinized or that relevant information was ignored.
The request for review was denied and the original order was upheld.
