Valerie L. Brown

The Society sought extended care for H.M., who was found in need of protection.

The mother, B.T., sought H.M.'s return.

The court found that while H.M. continued to need protection, the risk was low and B.T.'s parenting was adequate.

The court critically examined the Society's restrictive access policies and communication, which contributed to the strained relationship.

The final order placed H.M. in the mother's care under Society supervision for six months, with specific terms for communication and support, and no access for the father.

The accused was charged with voyeurism, extortion, sexual assault causing bodily harm, sexual assault (choking), and forcible confinement.

The Crown entered an acquittal for uttering threats.

The court assessed the credibility of the complainant and the accused, finding the complainant generally credible and her account supported by physical evidence, while the accused's testimony was unreliable and intentionally dishonest on material issues.

The court found the accused guilty of voyeurism, extortion, sexual assault causing bodily harm, sexual assault (choking), and forcible confinement.