The court dismissed the plaintiff's action against the Attorney General of Canada as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process under Rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiff sought $100 billion for alleged violations related to various judicial orders, claiming they were fraudulent and negligent.
The court affirmed the doctrine of judicial immunity, stating that judges are exempt from civil liability for acts in their judicial capacity, even if alleged to be in bad faith.
It also held that the Attorney General of Canada is not responsible or vicariously liable for judicial decisions, underscoring the independence of the judiciary.
The claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action.
