The parties separated after a 13-year cohabitation and 11-year marriage.
The applicant sought to resolve issues of spousal support, child support, and the timing of an agreed $90,000 equalization payment.
The court imputed income to both parties, finding the respondent was underemployed and the applicant had unexplained expenses exceeding his declared income.
The court dismissed the respondent's claim for ongoing spousal support, finding her entitlement was satisfied by previous payments from the family business.
The applicant was ordered to pay ongoing child support and retroactive arrears, with the equalization payment delayed until company mortgages become due or within three years.