The self-represented appellant mother and her current spouse appealed a decision striking her claims in an Amended Response to a Motion to Change and dismissing the spouse's non-party motion.
The motion judge had found the mother's claims to be vexatious and res judicata, as they sought to re-litigate child support and section 7 expense issues already determined at trial and upheld on multiple appeals.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the motion judge's determinations, no apprehension of bias, no Charter breach regarding the spouse's income disclosure, and no jurisdiction to strike the final order under Rule 25(19) of the Family Law Rules.
