The applicant brought an application alleging that the respondent children's aid society failed to comply with several terms of a mediated settlement agreement.
The agreement required the respondent to provide written reasons for certain decisions made during a child protection investigation, including the completion of assessments and the apprehension of the applicant's children.
The Board found that the respondent complied with the terms requiring explanations for the assessments.
However, the Board found the respondent failed to sufficiently explain why the applicant was not interviewed and why a proposed safety plan was rejected without an opportunity for amendment.
The respondent was ordered to provide further written reasons.