The defendants brought motions under Rule 21.01(1)(b) to strike the plaintiff's statement of claim for disclosing no reasonable cause of action, alleging "theft of trade secret" related to shilajit in vitamin compositions.
The plaintiff cross-moved for leave to amend.
The court found that the plaintiff's claim of a "trade secret" was invalid because the information had been publicly disclosed through patent applications, thereby forfeiting any confidentiality.
Furthermore, the plaintiff had assigned all rights, title, and interest in the invention to Creative Nutrition Canada Corp. in 1991, thus lacking proprietary interest to assert any claim.
The court concluded that the statement of claim, even with proposed amendments, was certain to fail.