The accused was charged with aggravated assault following the hospitalization of his two-month-old son with severe injuries, including multiple bone fractures and brain trauma.
The Crown relied on expert medical evidence to argue the injuries were inflicted by intentional force.
The defence presented competing expert testimony suggesting the injuries could have resulted from a stroke, infection, and metabolic bone disease.
The court found the defence experts raised a reasonable doubt regarding the cause of the injuries and acquitted the accused.
