The applicant requested a reconsideration of a decision finding he sustained minor injuries subject to the $3,500 funding limit.
The applicant sought to introduce new medical reports and MRI results under Rule 18.2(d) of the Common Rules of Practice and Procedure.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the evidence existed and could have been obtained prior to the original decision.
Furthermore, the Tribunal held that even if the evidence had been admitted, it was vague, lacked a causal connection to the accident, and would not have affected the outcome given the applicant's lack of functional limitations and return to work.
