Susan von Achten

Following the offender's convictions for firearms and breach offences, the Crown applied for forfeiture of $4,900 CAD and $325 USD seized during his arrest.

The court dismissed the application under the offence-related property regime, noting that drug trafficking is a CDSA offence, not a Criminal Code offence.

However, relying on expert evidence regarding indicia of drug trafficking and the offender's criminal history, the court found beyond a reasonable doubt that the seized funds were proceeds of crime.

The forfeiture application was granted.

The offender was convicted of possessing a loaded prohibited firearm and pleaded guilty to multiple breaches of court orders, including a weapons prohibition, recognizance, and probation.

The firearm was thrown from an 11th-floor window during a police raid and was found loaded and ready to fire.

The court found the firearm was possessed as a tool for drug trafficking, given the presence of scales, cash, and multiple cell phones.

As a recidivist firearms offender, the offender was sentenced to a total of 7 years' imprisonment, emphasizing denunciation and deterrence.

The accused was tried for unlawful possession of a prohibited firearm and unlawful possession of a loaded prohibited firearm.

During the execution of a search warrant by the Emergency Task Force at an 11th-floor apartment, an officer stationed outside observed a loaded Glock handgun being thrown from a bedroom window.

The accused and his girlfriend were found in the bedroom.

The court rejected the defence's arguments that the officer could not have seen the gun fall or that it was planted, and found the girlfriend's testimony that she did not throw the gun credible.

The court concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused threw the loaded firearm out the window upon hearing the police breach the door, and found him guilty on both counts.

Following convictions for lottery fraud, the Crown sought restitution, forfeiture, and fines in lieu of forfeiture against the accused.

The court ordered restitution of $12.5 million jointly and severally against the two primary offenders, declining to add interest.

The court also ordered forfeiture of approximately $7.5 million in seized funds, after returning specific amounts to innocent third parties.

Finally, the court imposed fines in lieu of forfeiture of $2.3 million each on the two primary offenders, with a six-year term of imprisonment in default of payment.

The accused were charged with multiple offences relating to the theft and fraudulent claiming of a $12.5 million winning Super 7 lottery ticket.

The Crown alleged that a convenience store clerk stole the winning free play ticket from a customer and subsequently had his daughter claim the prize.

Relying on circumstantial evidence, including lottery terminal data, cellphone records, and banking records, the court found the father guilty of theft, fraud, and possession of stolen property.

The daughter was found guilty of fraud and possession of stolen property.

The son was found guilty of stealing other lottery tickets but acquitted of the charges relating to the $12.5 million ticket.

All accused were acquitted of money laundering.