The applicant father brought a motion for equal decision-making and a 2/2/3 shared parenting schedule at his separate residence.
The respondent mother brought a cross-motion for sole decision-making and exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.
The court found that the status quo was an equal parenting arrangement under a previous consent order, and that it was in the children's best interests to maintain equal parenting time but in separate residences to reduce conflict.
The father's motion for equal decision-making and a graduated shared parenting schedule was granted.
The mother's cross-motion for exclusive possession was dismissed as unnecessary given the father's undertaking not to return to the home.
