The applicant, who has a developmental disability, requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her allegations of an ongoing discriminatory wage differential as out of time.
The Tribunal previously found that the ongoing practice of paying her less than non-disabled employees was not a continuing contravention under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.
On reconsideration, the Tribunal found that the ongoing wage differential constituted a series of incidents, making the allegations timely.
The Tribunal granted the request for reconsideration and directed further proceedings to determine the merits and potential remedy.
