The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and draft Plan of Subdivision to permit a 67-unit single-detached residential development on a former golf course.
Following a previous Tribunal decision allowing the appeals, the parties agreed to a revised draft plan that eliminated a cul-de-sac, improved road connectivity, and provided additional parkland.
The Tribunal found the revised plan and zoning by-law amendment conformed to the approved Official Plan Amendment, satisfied the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act, and represented good planning.
The appeal was allowed in part to approve the revised instruments.
