3 total
OMB decision that major retail use in an Employment Area is not a conversion upheld as reasonable.
The City of Toronto appealed an Ontario Municipal Board decision finding that Home Depot's application to develop a major retail store in an Employment Area did not constitute a 'conversion' under the Growth Plan.
The Divisional Court held that the standard of review for the Board's interpretation of planning documents is reasonableness.
The Court found the Board's conclusion—that major retail use was already contemplated in the Official Plan and thus not a conversion—was reasonable.
The appeal was dismissed.
Leave to appeal granted to review OMB's interpretation of 'conversion' under the Growth Plan.
The applicant municipality sought leave to appeal an interlocutory decision of the Ontario Municipal Board.
The Board had determined that the respondent's proposed large retail store development in a designated Employment Area did not constitute a 'conversion' under the Growth Plan, and thus did not require a municipal comprehensive review.
The court granted leave to appeal, finding that the application was not premature given the fundamental nature of the question, there was good reason to doubt the correctness of the Board's interpretation of the Official Plan and Growth Plan, and the issue was of sufficient general importance to land use planning in Ontario.
Appeal regarding Ontario Municipal Board's jurisdiction over official plan amendments quashed as premature.
The appellant appealed an Ontario Municipal Board order regarding its jurisdiction to extend the boundaries of an adopted official plan amendment and to change the proposed uses.
The Divisional Court held that the Board has jurisdiction to do both as a matter of general principle, though it could exceed its jurisdiction by acting unreasonably.
However, the court quashed the appeal as premature because the Board had not yet made a decision on the specific modifications.
