The Crown brought a motion for an order of reversal of judgment under s. 70 of the Supreme Court Act, consenting to a new trial.
The appellant resisted the motion, as he sought an acquittal based on fresh evidence.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that while s. 70 applies to criminal appeals, it cannot be used to force a consent order on an unwilling appellant unless the disposition gives the appellant all the relief that would be available if completely successful.
Since the appellant could potentially be acquitted if completely successful, the Crown's unilateral consent to a new trial was insufficient.
The motion was dismissed.