The respondent brought a motion for interim child and spousal support.
The parties were separated but continued to reside in the matrimonial home with their children.
The applicant was paying all carrying costs for the home, joint debts, and children's expenses.
The court dismissed the motion as premature, finding that interim support is generally not payable when the payor spouse covers all carrying costs while the parties reside together under the same roof.
The respondent was granted liberty to renew the motion once the matrimonial home is sold.
