The Crown sought to admit a statement made by the accused during a polygraph interview.
The accused argued the statement was involuntary because the police officer used unsettling questions and failed to inform him that he had passed the polygraph test before continuing the interrogation.
The court applied the Oickle framework and found that the accused had an operating mind, was not subjected to threats or inducements, and understood his rights to leave or contact counsel.
The statement was ruled voluntary and admissible.
