The applicant brought an uncontested motion to change a prior custody and access order concerning two young children.
She sought supervised access, third-party exchange arrangements, enforcement provisions, relocation permission beyond a 30‑kilometre radius, and increased child support.
The court found insufficient admissible evidence to vary child support or permit relocation but accepted uncontroverted evidence of conflict and abusive conduct during exchanges.
The court ordered that all access exchanges and communications occur through a mutually agreed third party and imposed forfeiture consequences for late pickups or returns.
The request for supervised access and relocation was denied due to insufficient evidence.