The appellant appealed the Committee of Adjustment's denial of minor variances required to construct a two-storey detached dwelling.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement on a revised application that eliminated one variance and modified others.
Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found that the revised variances met the four tests under the Planning Act, representing good planning and appropriate infill development.
The appeal was allowed in part and the revised variances were authorized subject to conditions.
