The appellant appealed a trial judgment, arguing that pre-trial spousal support payments exceeded the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines and that the trial judge erred by not ensuring the respondent had a Turkish interpreter.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding it was within the trial judge's discretion not to revisit the pre-trial financial arrangements, especially since income was imputed to both parties.
The Court also found no miscarriage of justice regarding the lack of an interpreter, as both parties were represented by counsel and the respondent sought clarification when needed.
