The applicants sought approval of a settlement agreement regarding the validity and distribution of the deceased's estate.
The parties agreed that the 2017 will was valid but proposed a distribution that deviated from its terms.
The Office of the Children's Lawyer filed a rejection of settlement on behalf of a minor grandchild who had a potential interest under an earlier will.
The court approved the settlement despite the rejection, finding that Rule 75.07.1 does not grant a non-party absolute veto power over settlement approval, but rather requires the court to consider the non-party's rights when assessing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable.