The applicant brought a motion requesting leave to proceed with an urgent motion for spousal support.
Pursuant to a newly effective Notice to the Profession and Family Law Litigants and Protocol for Central East Region, leave on the basis of urgency was no longer required since a case conference had already been held.
The court dismissed the motion for leave without prejudice, noting it was unnecessary, and directed the applicant to file an Assignment Court Confirmation request to proceed with her intended motion.
