Two consolidated appeals concerning guardianship and personal care arrangements for an elderly woman with Alzheimer's disease.
The applications judge appointed one daughter as guardian of personal care and a trust company as guardian of property, with compensation awarded to the daughter for past care services.
A subsequent motion to vary the guardianship order was heard based on changed circumstances.
The appellants challenged the guardianship appointments, the compensation award, and alleged judicial bias and misconduct by the section 3 counsel.
The Court of Appeal dismissed all appeals, finding no error in the applications judge's decisions and rejecting allegations of bias and misconduct.
