The plaintiff, a factoring company, sought summary judgment against a transport company and its directors for breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation related to uncollectible accounts receivable.
The court granted summary judgment for breach of contract against all defendants and for fraudulent misrepresentation against one director (Brar).
However, the fraud claims against the other director (Sharma) were dismissed due to insufficient evidence of his knowledge or recklessness.
The court also addressed the principles of summary judgment, partial summary judgment, and piercing the corporate veil.
