2 total
A stay of proceedings was granted for a 16.5-month delay caused by late Crown disclosure.
The accused brought a motion for a stay of proceedings based on an alleged violation of their right to be tried without unreasonable delay under section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The total delay from arrest to anticipated trial completion was approximately 16.5 months, just below the 18-month presumptive ceiling established in R. v. Jordan.
The court found that the accused demonstrated meaningful and sustained efforts to expedite proceedings, that no delay was attributable to the defence, and that the Crown failed to provide timely disclosure.
The court determined that approximately six months of added delay resulted from the Crown's failure to disclose materials that could have been provided within 90-120 days of arrest.
The court granted the stay of all charges.
The court quashed a Justice of the Peace's order returning a seized vehicle, finding that the presumption of innocence and financial hardship are irrelevant to a detention order under s. 490(1) of the Criminal Code.
The Crown applied for certiorari and mandamus to quash a Justice of the Peace's decision to return a vehicle seized as offence-related property under the Criminal Code and Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA).
The Justice of the Peace had refused detention, considering irrelevant factors such as the accused's presumption of innocence and potential financial hardship.
The Superior Court found that the Justice of the Peace erred by failing to apply the correct legal test under s. 490(1) of the Criminal Code, which provides limited discretion for detention orders, particularly when property is required for a future forfeiture hearing.
The court granted the application, quashed the return order, and remitted the matter for proper consideration.
