The applicant condominium owner challenged an amended parking rule that prohibited parking both a car and a motorcycle in a single designated parking spot.
The applicant argued the rule change process was flawed, the rule was inconsistent with the condominium's Declaration, and it was unreasonable.
The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that while there were minor deficiencies in the notice of the rule amendment, they did not invalidate the rule.
The Tribunal concluded the amended rule was clear, consistent with the Declaration, and met the high threshold for reasonableness, dismissing the application.