SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

WILLIAM DALE MACLEOD

Applicant

-AND-

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO

Respondent

BEFORE: F.L. Myers J.

READ: November 20, 2015

endorsement

[1] This motion was referred to me by the registrar’s office pursuant to rule 2.1.01(7) following receipt of a written request of counsel for the respondent under rule 2.1.01(6).

[2] The applicant has filed a notice of application but no supporting evidence as yet. In the notice of application, the applicant seeks first:

(a) An order for the disbursement of any applicable benefits and exemption from requirement to pass credit check and exemption from age of majority (unless heard after the applicants turns eighteen on November 4th 2015), with the following applicable list of reasons.

[3] What then follows is a list of over 30 legal proceedings in which the applicant is or will be a party including three in the Supreme Court of Canada.

[4] The applicant then claims the disclosure of a number of documents by the government including transcripts from some of the listed cases and “all documents in relation with the Office of the Children’s Lawyer and the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee.” Finally, he seeks the dissolution of orders of Mew J. in three of the listed legal proceedings.

[5] The grounds listed for the relief sought have to do with the question of whether a minor is allowed to apply for a credit product.

[6] I am afraid that I cannot understand what legal relief the applicant seeks or the factual or legal basis for the relief claimed. He is not using words in a way that convey a clear meaning. I do not understand what legal relief he seeks or the grounds for doing so.

[7] The applicant should be provided with an opportunity to make submissions as to why this proceeding should not be dismissed at this stage.

[8] On reviewing the material forwarded by the registrar, the court makes the following order:

a. Pursuant to subrule 2.1.01(3)(1), the registrar is directed to give notice to the applicant in Form 2.1A that the court is considering making an order under Rule 2.1.01 dismissing the application;

b. Pending the outcome of the written hearing under rule 2.1 or further order of the court, the application is stayed pursuant to s.106 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.C.43[^1];

c. The registrar shall accept no further filings in this application excepting only the applicant’s written submissions if delivered in accordance with rule 2.1.01(3);

d. In addition to the service by mail required by 2.1.01(4) rule, the registrar is to serve a copy of this endorsement and a Form 2.1A notice on the applicant and counsel for the respondent by email if it has their email addresses.

________________________________ F.L. Myers J.

Date: November 20, 2015

[^1]: See Gao v. Ontario WSIB et al., 2014 ONSC 6100 at para.