The parties brought competing motions regarding relocation, primary residence, parenting time, and school enrolment.
The applicant mother sought to relocate with the children from Oakville to Brampton, primary residence, and to change the children's schools.
The respondent father opposed the relocation and sought equal parenting time and for the children to remain in their current schools.
The court dismissed the applicant's motion for relocation, finding she failed to meet the burden of proof under s. 16.93(1) of the Divorce Act and that the move was not in the children's best interests.
The court ordered equal parenting time on a week-about basis and directed that the children remain enrolled in their Oakville schools.
