3 total
An Indigenous offender received a suspended sentence for possessing a loaded prohibited firearm due to severe intergenerational trauma.
The offender pleaded guilty to possession of a loaded prohibited, modified firearm and possession of that firearm in contravention of a court order prohibiting him from possessing firearms.
The Crown sought a penitentiary sentence of 3.5 years less credit for pretrial custody.
The court imposed a suspended sentence with three years of probation, crediting 1,032 days of pretrial custody (2 years, 10 months, and 2 days), with 900 days attributed to the firearm possession and 132 days consecutive for the breach of the prohibition order.
The sentencing was significantly influenced by the offender's Gladue report, which documented severe intergenerational trauma stemming from residential schools, multiple family deaths, and systemic disadvantage affecting his moral culpability.
The court emphasized rehabilitation and restorative justice through Indigenous community support services rather than additional incarceration.
Bail denied on secondary grounds due to inadequate supervision plan and public safety concerns.
The accused, charged with kidnapping, firearms offences, and possession of explosives, sought judicial interim release.
The Crown sought detention on primary, secondary, and tertiary grounds.
Due to the firearms charges, the onus was on the accused to justify release.
The court found the proposed plan of supervision inadequate given the accused's obsession with the complainant and weapons.
Detention was ordered on the secondary grounds to ensure the safety and protection of the public.
The court ordered the pre-trial detention of the accused on secondary grounds due to public safety concerns.
A bail hearing concerning a reverse onus matter where the accused was charged with 26 offences including kidnapping, unlawful confinement, uttering threats, dangerous driving, firearms offences, and possession of explosives.
The accused, facing serious personal and financial difficulties, allegedly kidnapped a city lawyer at gunpoint and held him in an industrial facility while demanding financial compensation.
The court found the Crown's case strong and determined that the proposed sureties and plan of release were inadequate to address concerns regarding the accused's obsession with the complainant and weapons.
Detention was ordered on secondary grounds.
