The applicant sought an interim injunction under the Commercial Tenancies Act for immediate access to leased premises, to restrain the respondent from re-entry, and to register the lease on title.
The court granted the injunction for re-entry and restraining the respondent, finding the applicant met the test for interlocutory injunctions, including a serious issue, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience.
The respondent's allegations of lease breaches were vague and unsupported.
However, the court declined to permit registration of the lease on title, as the parties had agreed against it in the lease, and the order's intent was to restore the status quo.