During a criminal proceeding, the defendants applied to exclude recordings of intercepted conversations.
The Crown sought to admit sessions 381 and 842.
The court found that portions of session 381 were sufficiently audible and contextualized to be admitted, while prejudicial portions regarding personal drug use were excluded.
The court ruled that session 842 was inadmissible hearsay, as the statements had no evidentiary value unless admitted for the truth of their contents.
