The applicant condominium owner requested a copy of the Zoom video recording of an owner-requisitioned meeting.
The respondent condominium corporation refused, arguing the recording was not a record under the Condominium Act and was only made to assist in drafting minutes.
The Tribunal found that the video recording was a record of the corporation because it was created and maintained for a purpose related to managing the corporation.
However, the Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the applicant's request was not solely related to his interests as an owner, as he sought the recording to rewrite the meeting minutes to his own expectations rather than waiting for the draft minutes to be reviewed and voted upon by owners.